Subgraphs let you compose complex agents from smaller, focused units. agent() tracks subagent execution through dedicated signals, giving you visibility into delegated work.
Subgraphs vs subagents
LangGraph calls them subgraphs (modular graph composition). Deep Agents calls them subagents (task delegation). agent() supports both patterns through the same API.
How subgraph composition works
Subgraph composition starts on the agent side. Each subgraph is a fully compiled StateGraph that can be added as a node in a parent graph.
from langgraph.graph import END, START, MessagesState, StateGraphfrom langchain_openai import ChatOpenAIllm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-5-mini")# --- Research subgraph ---def search_web(state: MessagesState) -> dict: query = state["messages"][-1].content results = web_search(query) return {"messages": [{"role": "assistant", "content": results}]}def summarize_results(state: MessagesState) -> dict: response = llm.invoke(state["messages"]) return {"messages": [response]}research_builder = StateGraph(MessagesState)research_builder.add_node("search", search_web)research_builder.add_node("summarize", summarize_results)research_builder.add_edge(START, "search")research_builder.add_edge("search", "summarize")research_builder.add_edge("summarize", END)research_subgraph = research_builder.compile()# --- Analysis subgraph ---def analyze_data(state: MessagesState) -> dict: response = llm.invoke([ {"role": "system", "content": "Analyze the data and provide insights."}, *state["messages"], ]) return {"messages": [response]}analysis_builder = StateGraph(MessagesState)analysis_builder.add_node("analyze", analyze_data)analysis_builder.add_edge(START, "analyze")analysis_builder.add_edge("analyze", END)analysis_subgraph = analysis_builder.compile()# --- Parent orchestrator ---def route_task(state: MessagesState) -> str: last = state["messages"][-1].content.lower() if "research" in last or "search" in last: return "research" return "analyze"builder = StateGraph(MessagesState)builder.add_node("research", research_subgraph)builder.add_node("analyze", analysis_subgraph)builder.add_conditional_edges(START, route_task)builder.add_edge("research", END)builder.add_edge("analyze", END)graph = builder.compile()
Tracking subagent execution
The subagents() signal contains a Map of active subagent streams. Use it to inspect the full set of delegated tasks and their current state.
const orchestrator = agent<OrchestratorState>({ assistantId: 'orchestrator', subagentToolNames: ['research', 'analyze', 'summarize'],});// All subagent streams (active and completed)const subagents = computed(() => orchestrator.subagents());// Only active onesconst running = computed(() => [...orchestrator.subagents().values()].filter((subagent) => subagent.status() === 'pending' || subagent.status() === 'running' ));const runningCount = computed(() => running().length);// Lookup helpers for common UI pathsconst specific = computed(() => orchestrator.getSubagent('research-tool-call-id'));const researchers = computed(() => orchestrator.getSubagentsByType('researcher'));// React to count changeseffect(() => { console.log(`${runningCount()} subagents currently running`);});
Subagent stream details
Each SubagentStreamRef exposes its own reactive signals — status, messages, and state — so you can surface granular progress in your UI.
// Access a specific subagent by its tool call IDconst researchAgent = computed(() => orchestrator.getSubagent('research-tool-call-id'));// Or get the subagents spawned by a specific AI message with tool callsconst messageAgents = computed(() => { const message = selectedAiMessage(); return message ? orchestrator.getSubagentsByMessage(message) : [];});// Track its progressconst researchStatus = computed(() => researchAgent()?.status());const researchMessages = computed(() => researchAgent()?.messages() ?? []);
Orchestrator pattern
The orchestrator pattern delegates specialised work to subagents and merges their results. Each subagent runs its own graph independently while the parent coordinates.
By default, subagent messages appear in the parent's messages() signal. Filter them out for a cleaner parent view.
const orchestrator = agent<OrchestratorState>({ assistantId: 'orchestrator', filterSubagentMessages: true, // Hide subagent messages from parent subagentToolNames: ['research', 'analyze'],});// Parent messages only (no subagent chatter)const parentMessages = computed(() => orchestrator.messages());
Subagent tool names
Set subagentToolNames to the tool names that spawn subagents. agent() uses this to identify which tool calls create subagent streams.
Error handling per subagent
Each subagent exposes its own error() signal so failures are isolated — one subagent failing does not stop the others.
const agents = orchestrator.subagents();for (const [id, agent] of agents) { effect(() => { const err = agent.error(); if (err) { console.error(`Subagent ${id} failed:`, err.message); // Retry, surface to user, or fall back gracefully } });}// Collect all failed subagents reactivelyconst failedAgents = computed(() => [...orchestrator.subagents().entries()].filter( ([, agent]) => agent.status() === 'error' ));
Partial failures
Always check failedAgents() before presenting final results. A completed orchestrator can still have subagents that errored — success at the top level does not guarantee all delegates succeeded.
When to use subagents vs a single agent
Choosing your architecture
Use subagents when tasks are independent and can run in parallel, when each task needs its own context window, or when you want isolated error boundaries. Use a single agent for sequential reasoning, tasks that share tightly coupled state, or when latency from spawning subagents outweighs the parallelism benefit.